Henrik Rydenfelt

References to “Peirce in Finland”

European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy



Bauters, Merja (2006). “Semiosis of (Target) Groups: Peirce, Mead and the Subject”. Subject Matters 206 2(2): 73–102.


Bergman, Mats (2000a). Meaning and Mediation: Toward a Communicative Interpretation of Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Helsinki: Department of Communication.


Bergman, Mats (2000b). “Reflections of the Role of the Communicative Sign in Semeiotic”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36(2): 225–54.


Bergman, Mats (2003). “Peirce’s Derivations of the Interpretant”. Semiotica 144(1-2):1–17.


Bergman, Mats (2005). “C. S. Peirce’s Dialogical Conception of Sign Processes”. Studies in Philosophy and Education 24:213–33.


Bergman, Mats (2004). Fields of Signification: Explorations in Charles S. Peirce’s Theory

of Signs. Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 6.


Bergman, Mats (2007a). “Representationism and Presentationism”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43(1):53–89.


Bergman, M. (2007b). “Common Grounds and Shared Purposes: On Some Pragmatic Ingredients of Communication”. Cognitio 8(1):23–43


Bergman, Mats (2009a). “Experience, Purpose, and the Value of Vagueness: On C. S. Peirce's Contribution to the Philosophy of Communication”. Communication Theory 19(3):248–277.


Bergman, Mats (2009b). Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication. Continuum, London & New York.


Bergman, Mats (2010). “C. S. Peirce on Interpretation and Collateral Experience”. Signs - International Journal of Semiotics 3:134–161.


Bergman, Mats (2011). “Beyond the Interaction Paradigm? Radical Constructivism, Universal Pragmatics, and Peircean Pragmatism”. The Communication Review 14(3):96–122.


Bergman, Mats (2012). “Pragmatism as a Communication-Theoretical Tradition: An Assessment of Craig’s Proposal”. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4(1):208–21.


Bergman, Mats (2013). “Fields of Rhetoric: Inquiry, Communication, and Learning”. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45(7).


Haaparanta, Leila (1994b). “Peirce and the Logic of Logical Discovery”. In Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science: Papers from the Harvard Sesquicentennial Congress. E. C. Moore (ed.). The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa and London, pp. 105–118.


Haaparanta, Leila (1994a). “Charles Peirce and the Drawings of the Mind”. Histoire, Epistemologie, Langage 16:35–52.


Haaparanta, Leila (2001). "On Peirce's Methodology of Logic and Philosophy", in Explanatory Connections. Electronic essays dedicated to Matti Sintonen. Petri Ylikoski & Mika Kiikeri (eds.). http://www.helsinki.fi/teoreettinenfilosofia/henkilosto/Sintonen/Explanatory%20Essays/haaparanta.pdf


Hartama-Heinonen, Ritva (2012). “‘Interpretation is Merely Another Word for Translation’. A Peircean Approach to Translation, Interpretation and Meaning”. COLLeGIUM: Studies across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences 7. Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Helsinki, pp. 113–129.


Hilpinen, Risto (1982). “On C. S. Peirce's Theory of the Proposition: Peirce as a Precursor of Game-Theoretical Semantics”. The Monist 65 (2):182–188.


Hilpinen, Risto (1990). “Peirce, Goodman and the Aesthetic Sign”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:177–184.


Hilpinen, Risto (1992). “On Peirce's Philosophical Logic: Propositions and Their Objects”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (3):467–488.


Hilpinen, Risto (2011). “Remarks on the Iconicity and Interpretation of Existential Graphs”. Semiotica 186:169–187.


Hintikka, Jaakko (1973). Logic, Language-Games and Information: Kantian Themes in the Philosophy of Logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford.


Hintikka, Jaakko (1976). “Quine vs. Peirce?” Dialectica 30 (1):7–8.


Hintikka, Jaakko (1977). “Language‐Games”. Dialectica 31 (3‐4):225–245.


Hintikka, Jaakko (1980). “C. S. Peirce's "First Real Discovery" and Its Contemporary Relevance”. The Monist 63 (3):304–315.


Hintikka, Jaakko (1998). “What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (3).


Hintikka, Jaakko (forthcoming). "Comments” (on Pietarinen’s “Logical and Linguistic Games from Peirce to Grice to Hintikka"). Teorema, in press.


Kaila, Eino (1912). “William James: Amerikan filosofi”. In Valitut teokset 1: 1910–1935 [Selected Works 1: 1910–1935]. Ilkka Niiniluoto (ed.). Otava, Helsinki, pp. 80–92. English translation available as Kaila, Eino (2011). "William James: The Philosopher of America". Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47(2):136–145 (2011).


Kaila, Eino (1934). Persoonallisuus [Personality]. Otava, Helsinki.


Kaila, Eino (1986). Syvähenkinen elämä: Keskusteluja viimeisistä kysymyksistä [Life of Mental Depth: Discussions on Ultimate Questions]. Otava, Helsinki, 3rd ed.


Ketonen, Oiva (1954). “John Dewey 1859–1952”. Ajatus 18:85–98.


Ketonen, Oiva (1981). Eurooppalaisen ihmisen maailmankatsomus [The World-View

of the European Person]. WSOY, Porvoo, 3rd ed. (1st ed. 1961.)


Kilpinen, Erkki (2000). The Enormous Fly-Wheel of Society: Pragmatism’s Habitual Conception of Rationality and Social Theory. Research Reports 235. Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.


Kilpinen, Erkki (2008). “Memes versus Signs: On the Use of Meaning Concepts about Nature and Culture”. Semiotica 171 (1–4):215–237.


Kilpinen, Erkki (2009b). “Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Action”. In Pragmatist Perspectives. Sami Pihlström & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds.). Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica, pp. 163-179.


Kilpinen, Erkki (2009a). “The Habitual Conception of Action and Social Theory”. Semiotica 173 (1–4):99–128.


Kilpinen, E. (2010). “Problems in Applying Peirce in Social Sciences”. In Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference. Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds.). Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, pp. 86–104.


Kirjavainen, Heikki (1999). “Peirce, Rantala and Theological Semiotics”. In Snow, Forest, Silence: The Finnish Tradition of Semiotics. Acta Semiotica Fennica; vol. 7 Eero Tarasti (ed.). Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 81-94.


Knuuttila, Tarja (2010). “Not Just Underlying Structures: Towards a Semiotic Approach to Scientific Representation and Modeling”. In Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference. Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds.). Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, pp. 163–72.


Lång, Markus (2001). Johdatus tieteen logiikkaan ja muita kirjoituksia. [Introduction to the Logic of Science and Other Writings]. Translations of selected writings by C. S. Peirce. Vastapaino, Tampere.


Marila, Marko (2013). “Abduktiivinen päättely arkeologiassa: Arkeologian epistemologiasta sen historian ja nykytilanteen valossa” [“Abductive Reasoning in Archaeology. On the Epistemology of Archaeology in Light of Its History and Current Situation”]: Muinaistutkija 3(2013), 45–63.


Määttänen, Pentti (1993). Action and Experience: A Naturalistic Approach to Cognition. Annales Academiae Scientarum Fennicae B 64. Helsinki.


Määttänen, Pentti (2005). “Meaning as Use: Peirce and Wittgenstein”. in Times and History. Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, vol. 13. Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, pp. 171–172.


Määttänen, Pentti (2007). “Semiotics of Space: Peirce and Lefebvre”. Semiotica 166 (1-4):453-61.


Määttänen, Pentti (2009). Toiminta ja kokemus: Pragmatistista terveen järjen filosofiaa [Action and Experience: Pragmatist Common Sense Philosophy]. Gaudeamus, Helsinki.


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1980). “Scientific Progress”. Synthese 45 (3):427–62.


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1993). “Peirce’s Theory of Statistical Explanation”. In Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science. E. C. Moore (ed.). University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1999a). Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

& New York.


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1999b). “Defending Abduction”. Philosophy of Science 66 (3).


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2005). “Abduction and Truthlikeness”. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83(1):255–75.


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2010). “Peirce, Abduction and Scientific Realism”. In Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference. Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds.). Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, pp. 252–63.


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2011b). “Abduction, Tomography, and Other Inverse Problems”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42(1), 135–39.


Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2011a). “Revising Beliefs Towards the Truth”. Erkenntnis 75(2):165–81.


Paavola, Sami (2004b). “Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: The Importance of Strategies”. Foundations of Science 9(3):267–83


Paavola, Sami (2004a). “Abduction through Grammar, Critic and Methodeutic”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40(2): 245–70


Paavola, Sami & Hakkarainen, Kai (2005). “Three Abductive Solutions to the Meno Paradox: with Instinct, Inference, and Distributed Cognition”. Studies in Philosophy and Education 24:235–53.


Paavola, S (2006). On the Origin of Ideas: An Abductivist Approach to Discovery. Doctoral dissertation. Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 15.


Paavola, Sami, Hakkarainen, Kai & Sintonen, Matti (2006). “Abduction with Dialogical and Trialogical Means”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 14(2):137–50.


Paavola, Sami (2011). Diagrams, Iconicity, and Abductive Discovery. Semiotica 186(1): 297–314.


Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2004b). “Peirce's Magic Lantern: Moving Pictures of Thought”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society.


Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2004a). “Grice in the Wake of Peirce”. Pragmatics & Cognition 12:295–315.


Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2005). “Compositionality, Relevance and Peirce's Logic of Existential Graphs”, Axiomathes 15:513–540.


Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2006b). “Peirce's Contributions to Possible-worlds Semantics”, Studia Logica 82, 345-369.


Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2006a). Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication. Springer, Dordrecht.


Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (2010). “Challenges and Opportunities for Existential Graphs”. In Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference. Mats Bergman, Sami Paavola, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds.). Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, pp. 288–303.


Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko (forthcoming). "Logical and Linguistic Games from Peirce to Grice to Hintikka (with comments by J. Hintikka)". Teorema, in press


Pihlström, Sami (1996). Structuring the World: The Issue of Realism and the Nature of Ontological Problems in Classical and Contemporary Pragmatism. Acta Philosophica

Fennica 59. The Philosophical Society of Finland, Helsinki.


Pihlström, Sami (1998). “Peircean Scholastic Realism and Transcendental Arguments”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (2):382–413.


Pihlström, Sami (2001). “Oiva Ketosen pragmatismi- ja naturalismivaikutteista” [“On

Oiva Ketonen’s Pragmatist and Naturalist Influences”]. Ajatus 59:27–44.


Pihlström, Sami (2003a). Naturalizing the Transcendental: A Pragmatic View. Prometheus/Humanity Books, Amherst, NY.


Pihlström, Sami (2003b). “Pragmatistic Influences in Twentieth Century Finnish Philosophy: From Pre-Analytic to Post-Analytic Thought”. In Analytic Philosophy in Finland. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80. Leila Haaparanta & Ilkka Niiniluoto (eds.). Rodopi, Amsterdam & New York.


Pihlström, Sami (2004). “Peirce’s Place in the Pragmatist Tradition”. In The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cheryl Misak (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 27–57.


Pihlström Sami (2005). Pragmatic Moral Realism: a Transcendental Defense. Rodopi, Amsterdam.


Pihlström, Sami (2006), “Den tidiga receptionen av pragmatismen i Finland och Sverige”

[“The Early Reception of Pragmatism in Finland and Sweden”]. Mellan idealism och analytisk

filosofi: Den moderna filosofin i Finland och Sverige 1880 – 1950 [Between Idealism and

Analytic Philosophy: Modern Philosophy in Finland and Sweden, 1880 – 1950]. Nike Parland, Stefan Nygård & Johan Strang (trans., eds.). Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland, Helsingfors, & Atlantis, Stockholm, pp. 111–141.


Pihlström, Sami (2008). “The Trail of the Human Serpent Is over Everything”: Jamesian

Perspectives on Mind, World, and Religion. University Press of America (Rowman

& Littlefield Publishing Group), Lanham, MD.


Pihlström, Sami (2009b). “Nordic Pragmatism”. In Pragmatist Perspectives. Sami Pihlström & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds.). Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.


Pihlström, Sami (2009a). Pragmatist Metaphysics: an Essay on the Ethical Grounds of Ontology. Continuum, London.


Pihlström, Sami (2011). Transcendental Guilt: Reflections on Ethical Finitude. Lexington Books.


Pihlström, Sami (2013). Pragmatic Pluralism and the Problem of God. Fordham University Press, New York.


Rantala, Veikko (2002). Explanatory Translation: Beyond the Kuhnian Model of Conceptual Change. Kluwer, New York.


Rydenfelt, Henrik (2011a). ”Epistemic Norms and Democracy: A Response to Talisse”. Metaphilosophy 42(5).


Rydenfelt, Henrik (2011b). “Naturalism and Normative Science”. In Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism. Jonathan Knowles & Henrik Rydenfelt (eds.). Peter Lang, Berlin & New York.


Rydenfelt, Henrik (2013a). “Sensitive Truths and Sceptical Doubt”. In William James on Religion. Henrik Rydenfelt & Sami Pihlström (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.


Rydenfelt, Henrik (2013b). “Constructivist Problems, Realist Solutions”. In  Persuasion and Compulsion in Democracy. Jacquelyn Kegley & Chris Skowronski (eds.). Lexington Books.


Rydenfelt, Henrik (2014a). “Realism without Mirrors”. In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. M. C. Galavotti, D. Dieks, W. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel and M. Weber (eds.). Springer, New York.


Rydenfelt, Henrik (2014b). “Scientific Method and the Realist Hypothesis”. In Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words. Bent Sorensen & Thorkild Thellefsen (ed.). Walter de Gruyter–Mouton.


Tarasti, Eero (2006). “Peirceläistä käännösteoriaa” [“Peircean Theory of Translation”]. Synteesi 25(1):94-96.


Vehkavaara, Tommi (2002). "Why and How to Naturalize Semiotic Concepts for Biosemiotics". Sign Systems Studies 30(1):293–313


Vehkavaara, Tommi (2005): "Limitations on Applying Peircean Semeiotic. Biosemiotics as Applied Objective Ethics and Esthetics rather than Semeiotic". Journal of Biosemiotics 1(2):269–308.


Vehkavaara, Tommi (2006): "From the Logic of Science to the Logic of the Living. The Relevance of Charles Peirce to Biosemiotics". In Introduction to Biosemiotics. The New Biological Synthesis. Marcello Barbieri (ed.). Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 257–82.


Veivo, Harri (2005). “Présentation: Peirce et les études littéraires”. RSSI: recherches sémiotiques 24(1-3):3–17.


Veivo, Harri (2011). Portti ja polku. Tutkimus kirjallisuuden semiotiikasta [The Gate and the Path. A Study on the Semiotics of Literature]. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki.


von Wright, Georg Henrik (1941). The Logical Problem of Induction. Acta Philosophica Fennica 3. Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki.


von Wright, Georg Henrik (1943). Den logiska empirismen: En huvudriktning i modern

filosofi [Logical Empiricism: A Main Orientation in Modern Philosophy]. Söderströms, Helsingfors.